Gurumitkal Police Station vs Ashappa — 93/2019
Case under Sec of Ipc Section Under,Section,304,IPC. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAYG010014912019
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
94/2019
Filing Date
19-11-2019
Registration No
93/2019
Registration Date
19-11-2019
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR
Judge
1568-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,YADGIR
FIR Details
FIR Number
0064
Police Station
GURUMITKAL PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gurumitkal Police Station
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
Ashappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1568-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,YADGIR
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL | |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition sheet (Form No. 4 Civil) from the First Additional District and Sessions Judge's Court in Yadgir, Karnataka, relating to S.C. Case No. 93/2019. The witness (Kasamma, 35-year-old widow of deceased Hanamant) testified regarding her husband's death and alleged assault by the accused (her brother-in-law). During examination-in-chief by the government prosecutor, the witness was later declared a hostile witness by the court and subjected to cross-examination by the defense counsel. The defense counsel declined to cross-examine the witness further, and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition sheet (Form No. 4 Civil) from the First Additional District and Sessions Judge's Court in Yadgir, Karnataka, relating to S.C. Case No. 93/2019. The witness (Kasamma, 35-year-old widow of deceased Hanamant) testified regarding her husband's death and alleged assault by the accused (her brother-in-law). During examination-in-chief by the government prosecutor, the witness was later declared a hostile witness by the court and subjected to cross-examination by the defense counsel. The defense counsel declined to cross-examine the witness further, and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts