Mallikarjun S/o Devindrappa Rampur, Age 28 Yrs, Occ Agri vs Yadgiri Rural PS — 99/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec,482,of,BNSS. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAYG010005762026
Filing Number
99/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
99/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR
Judge
1568-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,YADGIR
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
0035
Police Station
YADGIRI RURAL PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mallikarjun S/o Devindrappa Rampur, Age 28 Yrs, Occ Agri
Adv. G.BHEEM RAO
Akkamahadevi W/o Devindrappa Rampur, age 50 Yrs, occ Labourer
Chandappa s/o Devindrappa Rampur, Age 29 Yrs, occ Agri
Sharanappa S/o Devindrappa Rampur, Age 35 Yrs, Occ Agri
Gangamma W/o Mallikarjun Rampur, Age 32 Yrs, occ Labour
Respondent(s)
Yadgiri Rural PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 1568-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,YADGIR
Disposed
ORDERS-CRIMINAL
Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDERS-CRIMINAL |
| 10-03-2026 | Objection |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.99/2026 Court Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to five accused persons under Section 482 of BNSS. The judge found that charges involving unlawful assembly, abuse, and assault arising from a property dispute were non-capital offenses triable by Magistrate Court, with some charges being bailable in nature. Key Reasoning: The court noted the underlying land boundary dispute between brothers, absence of serious injuries to complainant, and that one accused (Chandappa) had documentary evidence of being in Bengaluru during the incident. Applying the principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception," the judge determined the accused merited release on personal bonds of Rs.1,00,000 each with surety, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.99/2026 Court Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to five accused persons under Section 482 of BNSS. The judge found that charges involving unlawful assembly, abuse, and assault arising from a property dispute were non-capital offenses triable by Magistrate Court, with some charges being bailable in nature. Key Reasoning: The court noted the underlying land boundary dispute between brothers, absence of serious injuries to complainant, and that one accused (Chandappa) had documentary evidence of being in Bengaluru during the incident. Applying the principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception," the judge determined the accused merited release on personal bonds of Rs.1,00,000 each with surety, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts