Mallikarjun S/o Devindrappa Rampur, Age 28 Yrs, Occ Agri vs Yadgiri Rural PS — 99/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec,482,of,BNSS. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAYG010005762026

Filing Number

99/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR

Judge

1568-I Addl.district And Sessions Judge,yadgir

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0035

Police Station

YADGIRI RURAL PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec,482,of,BNSS
Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita Section U/Sec,189(2),191(2),191(3),115(2),118(1),118(2),74,352,126(2),351(2),190,of,BNS,2023

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mallikarjun S/o Devindrappa Rampur, Age 28 Yrs, Occ Agri

    Adv. G.BHEEM RAO

  2. 2.Akkamahadevi W/o Devindrappa Rampur, age 50 Yrs, occ Labourer

  3. 3.Chandappa s/o Devindrappa Rampur, Age 29 Yrs, occ Agri

  4. 4.Sharanappa S/o Devindrappa Rampur, Age 35 Yrs, Occ Agri

  5. 5.Gangamma W/o Mallikarjun Rampur, Age 32 Yrs, occ Labour

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yadgiri Rural PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.99/2026 Court Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to five accused persons under Section 482 of BNSS. The judge found that charges involving unlawful assembly, abuse, and assault arising from a property dispute were non-capital offenses triable by Magistrate Court, with some charges being bailable in nature. Key Reasoning: The court noted the underlying land boundary dispute between brothers, absence of serious injuries to complainant, and that one accused (Chandappa) had documentary evidence of being in Bengaluru during the incident. Applying the principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception," the judge determined the accused merited release on personal bonds of Rs.1,00,000 each with surety, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge,yadgir

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders-Criminal

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge,yadgir

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 99/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.99/2026 Court Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to five accused persons under Section 482 of BNSS. The judge found that charges involving unlawful assembly, abuse, and assault arising from a property dispute were non-capital offenses triable by Magistrate Court, with some charges being bailable in nature. Key Reasoning: The court noted the underlying land boundary dispute between brothers, absence of serious injuries to complainant, and that one accused (Chandappa) had documentary evidence of being in Bengaluru during the incident. Applying the principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception," the judge determined the accused merited release on personal bonds of Rs.1,00,000 each with surety, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case