Trivesh S/o Narayan Kalal, Age 34 Yrs, occ Agri vs Gurumitkal PS — 92/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec,482,of,BNSS. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAYG010005142026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
92/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR
Judge
936-PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE YADGIR
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
0029
Police Station
GURUMITKAL PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Trivesh S/o Narayan Kalal, Age 34 Yrs, occ Agri
Adv. C.S.MALI PATIL
Respondent(s)
Gurumitkal PS (Police Station)
Laxman S/o Tarachand Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 936-PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE YADGIR
Disposed
ORDERS-CRIMINAL
Objection
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDERS-CRIMINAL | |
| 10-03-2026 | Objection | |
| 07-03-2026 | NOTICE | |
| 04-03-2026 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir, allowed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Trivesh under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. The court found that the petitioner was entitled to bail because he had no prior criminal record, posed no threat to the victims, and the offenses charged (under BNS and SC/ST (P.A) Act, 1989) did not warrant continued custody. The petitioner was ordered released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 with a surety, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering of evidence, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yadgir, allowed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Trivesh under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. The court found that the petitioner was entitled to bail because he had no prior criminal record, posed no threat to the victims, and the offenses charged (under BNS and SC/ST (P.A) Act, 1989) did not warrant continued custody. The petitioner was ordered released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 with a surety, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering of evidence, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts