Mohmmed Riyaz S/o Mohammed Yusuf Gpgiyavar, age 35 Yrs, occ Private Work vs Bheemarayan Gudi PS — 50/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec,483,of,BNSS,2023. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAYG010003252026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
50/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
50/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIR
Judge
936-PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE YADGIR
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
0031
Police Station
BHEEMARAVANARGUDI PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohmmed Riyaz S/o Mohammed Yusuf Gpgiyavar, age 35 Yrs, occ Private Work
Adv. H M Patil
Respondent(s)
Bheemarayan Gudi PS (Police Station)
Laxmi w/o Mapanna Badiger Age 38 Yrs, Occ Household
Hearing History
Judge: 936-PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE YADGIR
Disposed
ORDERS-CRIMINAL
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDERS-CRIMINAL | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yadgiri rejected the bail petition of accused No.4 Mohammed Riyaz under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the accused was the principal assailant who killed the deceased Mapanna with dangerous weapons after receiving payment, playing a vital role in a conspiracy with other accused members. The court determined the allegations were serious in nature, supported by eyewitness testimony (CW.15 & CW.16), and distinguished this case from the bail granted to other co-accused, rejecting the accused's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yadgiri rejected the bail petition of accused No.4 Mohammed Riyaz under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the accused was the principal assailant who killed the deceased Mapanna with dangerous weapons after receiving payment, playing a vital role in a conspiracy with other accused members. The court determined the allegations were serious in nature, supported by eyewitness testimony (CW.15 & CW.16), and distinguished this case from the bail granted to other co-accused, rejecting the accused's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts