Jyoti W/o Hampanna Kolakar vs Hampanna S/o Lakkappa Kolakar — 1269/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 12. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVP510063772024
Filing Number
1274/2024
Filing Date
21-Sep-2024
Registration No
1269/2024
Registration Date
23-Sep-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SINDAGI
Judge
203-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jyoti W/o Hampanna Kolakar
Adv. B G Nellagi
-
2.Jyoti W/o Hampanna Kolakar
-
3.Shivaji S/o Hampanna Kolakar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hampanna S/o Lakkappa Kolakar
-
2.Lakkappa S/o Sidramappa Kolakar
-
3.Ambavva W/o Lakkappa Kolakar
-
4.Savita S/o Lakkappa Kolakar
-
5.Kavita S/o Lakkappa Kolakar
-
6.Pushpa D/o Lakkappa Kolakar
-
7.Renuka S/o Lakkappa Kolakar
-
8.Kalpana S/o Lakkappa Kolakar
-
9.Hanamantray S/o Yallappa Kaladagi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Order
Case Summary: Cri. Misc. No. 1269/2024 Court Decision: The court partly allowed the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, directing the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 2,000 to the wife and Rs. 1,500 for their 3-year-old child from the petition filing date. The court found economic abuse through neglect and non-compliance with interim orders, though it rejected the petitioner's higher maintenance claim of Rs. 35,000 due to insufficient documentary evidence of the respondent's income from agricultural land and business. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
19-May-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
18-May-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
28-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
21-Apr-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
18-Apr-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
24-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
20-Nov-2025
Deposition
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
21-Jul-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
18-Jul-2025
Order
-
18-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
07-Jul-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
02-Jul-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
30-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
21-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
16-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
10-Jun-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
06-Jun-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
12-May-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
28-Mar-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
22-Mar-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
21-Feb-2025
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
09-Jan-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
14-Oct-2024
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
26-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1269/2024
Case Summary: Cri. Misc. No. 1269/2024 Court Decision: The court partly allowed the petitioner's application under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, directing the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 2,000 to the wife and Rs. 1,500 for their 3-year-old child from the petition filing date. The court found economic abuse through neglect and non-compliance with interim orders, though it rejected the petitioner's higher maintenance claim of Rs. 35,000 due to insufficient documentary evidence of the respondent's income from agricultural land and business. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts