Priyanka Wo Sachin Rathod vs Sachin So Lingu Rathod — 794/2026
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12 of PWDV Act 2005. Status: Notice. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVP510021802026
Filing Number
843/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
794/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SINDAGI
Judge
203-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Priyanka Wo Sachin Rathod
Adv. Math Basavaraj Shambhulingayya
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sachin So Lingu Rathod
-
2.Kasturibai W/o Lingu Rathod
-
3.Lingu S/o Ramu Rathod
Case History
-
30-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
27-May-2026
I.A. Order
Case 794/2026 Summary: Priyanka filed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act alleging physical and mental harassment by her husband Sachin Rathod and in-laws after marriage in November 2024, claiming she was assaulted and thrown out in November 2025. She sought interim maintenance of Rs 10,000. The court partially allowed the application, directing respondent No-1 to pay Rs 3,000 as interim maintenance till further orders, noting the admitted marital relationship and husband's duty to maintain his wife, though the petitioner failed to provide documentary proof of the respondent's claimed income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
26-May-2026
Order On IA
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
-
19-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 794/2026
Case 794/2026 Summary: Priyanka filed a petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act alleging physical and mental harassment by her husband Sachin Rathod and in-laws after marriage in November 2024, claiming she was assaulted and thrown out in November 2025. She sought interim maintenance of Rs 10,000. The court partially allowed the application, directing respondent No-1 to pay Rs 3,000 as interim maintenance till further orders, noting the admitted marital relationship and husband's duty to maintain his wife, though the petitioner failed to provide documentary proof of the respondent's claimed income. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts