Mahiboob Patel So Abdul Ajeej Inamdar vs The Tahshildar Sindagi — 627/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVP510009102026

Filing Number

582/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

627/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SINDAGI

Judge

203-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

1.Mahiboob Patel So Abdul Ajeej Inamdar

Adv. Talawar Bhagyashree Chandrama.

Respondent(s)

1.The Tahshildar Sindagi

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
26-May-2026

Order

Case Summary: 627/2026 The court directed the Tahshildar Sindagi to register the petitioner Mahiboob Patel's name, date of birth (02.07.1980), and place of birth (Korawar village, Devar-Hipparagi) in the birth register after collecting prescribed fees. The court held that under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, the fact of birth is relevant, not the correctness of the date, and this entry shall not be conclusive proof if disputed in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
26-May-2026

Disposed

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
13-Mar-2026

First Hearing

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
03-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 627/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 627/2026 The court directed the Tahshildar Sindagi to register the petitioner Mahiboob Patel's name, date of birth (02.07.1980), and place of birth (Korawar village, Devar-Hipparagi) in the birth register after collecting prescribed fees. The court held that under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, the fact of birth is relevant, not the correctness of the date, and this entry shall not be conclusive proof if disputed in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.