Siddappa So Hanamant Huggennavar vs The Tahashildar Sindagi — 70/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 11th July 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVP510000952026

Filing Number

49/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SINDAGI

Judge

203-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

Decision Date

11-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Siddappa So Hanamant Huggennavar

    Adv. Shivanand Mallanagouda Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahashildar Sindagi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jul-2026

    Order

    The court disposed of the case between Siddappa So Hanamant Huggennavar and The Tahashildar Sindagi based on an order passed during pre-conciliation proceedings. The Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Sindagi concluded the matter accordingly without providing detailed reasoning in the available judgment text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  4. 27-May-2026

    Order

  5. 27-May-2026

    Settlement/ Referred To Lok Adalat / Adr

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  6. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  10. 24-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the case between Siddappa So Hanamant Huggennavar and The Tahashildar Sindagi based on an order passed during pre-conciliation proceedings. The Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Sindagi concluded the matter accordingly without providing detailed reasoning in the available judgment text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case