THE STATE OR THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs A-1 Basavaraj S/o Bhemanna Hunasigidad — 76/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVP500001342025

e-Filing Number

25-01-2025

Filing Number

74/2025

Filing Date

25-Jan-2025

Registration No

76/2025

Registration Date

29-Jan-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SINDAGI

Judge

915-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0269

Police Station

SINDAGI PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OR THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A-1 Basavaraj S/o Bhemanna Hunasigidad

  2. 2.A-2 Hulugappa S/o Mareppa Kokalore

    Adv. null

  3. 3.A-3 Kondayya S/o Bheemaray Parvatidoddi

    Adv. null

  4. 4.A-4 Ravikumar S/o Devindrappa Parvatidoddi

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  4. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Deposition

    Summary of Case 76/2025 In this criminal case before the Senior Civil Judge and JMF Court in Sindagi, Karnataka, the petitioner (State) filed a complaint regarding the theft of a motorcycle (registration number KA 28 EX 4748) on November 16, 2023. After police investigation, the recovered motorcycle was produced and witnesses were examined. The court examined two witnesses: Raghavendra Pujari and Sangumesh Hogar. Both witnesses testified regarding the circumstances of the theft and the police investigation into the matter. The case proceeded through cross-examination of witnesses and arguments from both the prosecution and the defense counsel representing the three accused (Basavaraj, Hulugappa, and Kondayya). The hearing was adjourned with no further cross-examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  11. 24-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  12. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  13. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  14. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  15. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  16. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  17. 12-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  18. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  19. 26-May-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  20. 22-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  21. 25-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  22. 21-Feb-2025

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Sindgi

  23. 29-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 25-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 76/2025 In this criminal case before the Senior Civil Judge and JMF Court in Sindagi, Karnataka, the petitioner (State) filed a complaint regarding the theft of a motorcycle (registration number KA 28 EX 4748) on November 16, 2023. After police investigation, the recovered motorcycle was produced and witnesses were examined. The court examined two witnesses: Raghavendra Pujari and Sangumesh Hogar. Both witnesses testified regarding the circumstances of the theft and the police investigation into the matter. The case proceeded through cross-examination of witnesses and arguments from both the prosecution and the defense counsel representing the three accused (Basavaraj, Hulugappa, and Kondayya). The hearing was adjourned with no further cross-examination required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case