Siddanagouda Wo Basanagouda Patil vs The Tahasildar Birth and Death Registrar, Tahasildar Office — 328/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th September 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVP410025302025
Filing Number
331/2025
Filing Date
22-May-2025
Registration No
328/2025
Registration Date
02-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDDEBIHAL
Judge
200-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siddanagouda Wo Basanagouda Patil
Adv. Anantapur Haseena Dongrisab
-
2.Dyamanaagouda So Basanagouda Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahasildar Birth and Death Registrar, Tahasildar Office
Case History
-
07-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal
-
04-May-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal
-
03-Nov-2025
Deposition
Case Summary: 328/2025 In this petition by Siddanagouda and Dyamanaagouda Patil against the Tahasildar Birth and Death Registrar, a witness was examined and sworn on 3.11.2025. The petitioners' counsel submitted their main arguments along with supporting documents (an affidavit, two Aadhaar cards, and two newspaper publications), which were marked as exhibits. Since the respondent filed no written reply or counter-arguments, no party objection was raised. The court found no further examination necessary and proceeded to order as requested by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal
-
03-Sep-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal
-
03-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 328/2025
Case Summary: 328/2025 In this petition by Siddanagouda and Dyamanaagouda Patil against the Tahasildar Birth and Death Registrar, a witness was examined and sworn on 3.11.2025. The petitioners' counsel submitted their main arguments along with supporting documents (an affidavit, two Aadhaar cards, and two newspaper publications), which were marked as exhibits. Since the respondent filed no written reply or counter-arguments, no party objection was raised. The court found no further examination necessary and proceeded to order as requested by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts