The State of Karnataka R/by PSI Muddebihal PS vs Ayyalappa S/o Ryavappa Kambali — 113/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/sec.354,354(A),354(B),506 R/w 34,of IPC. Status: NBW. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.

NBW Next hearing 06-Aug-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVP400006962022

e-Filing Number

09-12-2022

Filing Number

113/2022

Filing Date

09-Dec-2022

Registration No

113/2022

Registration Date

09-Dec-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDDEBIHAL

Judge

199-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

MUDDEBIHAL PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section U/sec.354,354(A),354(B),506 R/w 34,of IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka R/by PSI Muddebihal PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ayyalappa S/o Ryavappa Kambali

  2. 2.Sangappa S/o Ningappa Bagewadi

Case History

  1. 06-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    NBW

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Deposition

    Summary of Case 113/2022 On 01.12.2025, the court examined witness testimony and recorded statements. The witness (Accused-6) testified regarding a land dispute and denied presence at the crime scene, claiming to have visited his own property. However, the court found significant inconsistencies in his testimony regarding timings and locations. The witness admitted to filing a false complaint against Accused-6 on a related matter. The court found the witness testimony unreliable and noted contradictions between different accused persons' statements regarding their whereabouts at the time of the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  7. 27-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  8. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  9. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  10. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  11. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  12. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  13. 23-Dec-2024

    Deposition

  14. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  15. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  16. 31-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  17. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  18. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  19. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  20. 17-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  21. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  22. 20-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  23. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  24. 16-Jun-2023

    Hearing On Charge-Hbc

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  25. 26-Apr-2023

    Hearing On Charge-Hbc

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  26. 25-Jan-2023

    Hearing On Charge-Hbc

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Muddebihal

  27. 09-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 09-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 113/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 113/2022 On 01.12.2025, the court examined witness testimony and recorded statements. The witness (Accused-6) testified regarding a land dispute and denied presence at the crime scene, claiming to have visited his own property. However, the court found significant inconsistencies in his testimony regarding timings and locations. The witness admitted to filing a false complaint against Accused-6 on a related matter. The court found the witness testimony unreliable and noted contradictions between different accused persons' statements regarding their whereabouts at the time of the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case