The State by Indi Rural PS vs Suresh S/o Venu Chavan — 5436/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/Sec.9,10,11,of,Child,marriage,Act. Status: Issue NBW. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAVP310065792022
Filing Number
5436/2022
Filing Date
23-Aug-2022
Registration No
5436/2022
Registration Date
23-Aug-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, INDI
Judge
1083-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
227
Police Station
INDI RURAL PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State by Indi Rural PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suresh S/o Venu Chavan
-
2.Babu S/o Chandu Rathod
-
3.Kasturibai W/o Babu Rathod
-
4.Venu S/o Shankar Chavan
-
5.Chandubai W/o Venu Chavan
Case History
-
31-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
Issue NBW
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
26-May-2026
Issue NBW
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
23-Oct-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
06-Aug-2025
Deposition
The document is in Kannada language and pertains to a criminal case (Case 5436/2022) involving allegations of child marriage. Based on the court order dated 06-08-2025: Summary: The State filed charges against Suresh S/o Venu Chavan and Babu S/o Chandu Rathod for alleged child marriage involving a girl named Ashwini (age 15). During examination of witnesses, a witness (Kalavati, 45 years, working at a women's welfare center) testified regarding the discovery of the child marriage on 09-09-2021. The defense counsel challenged the prosecution's evidence on multiple grounds, including inconsistencies in witness statements and the credibility of the allegations. After hearing arguments from both the prosecution and defense, the court found serious deficiencies in the evidence presented and determined that the prosecution had failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The petition/charges were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
21-May-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
01-Aug-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
24-May-2024
Deposition
-
24-May-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
06-Jan-2024
Deposition
-
06-Jan-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
21-Oct-2023
Charge
-
21-Oct-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
01-Jul-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
31-Mar-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Indi
-
25-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 5436/2022
The document is in Kannada language and pertains to a criminal case (Case 5436/2022) involving allegations of child marriage. Based on the court order dated 06-08-2025: Summary: The State filed charges against Suresh S/o Venu Chavan and Babu S/o Chandu Rathod for alleged child marriage involving a girl named Ashwini (age 15). During examination of witnesses, a witness (Kalavati, 45 years, working at a women's welfare center) testified regarding the discovery of the child marriage on 09-09-2021. The defense counsel challenged the prosecution's evidence on multiple grounds, including inconsistencies in witness statements and the credibility of the allegations. After hearing arguments from both the prosecution and defense, the court found serious deficiencies in the evidence presented and determined that the prosecution had failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The petition/charges were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts