The State of Karnataka Rby PSI Basavana Bagewadi PS vs Prakash Mallikarjun Jadar — 1060/2025

Case under Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 78(VI). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVP210014412025

e-Filing Number

28-05-2025

Filing Number

1059/2025

Filing Date

28-May-2025

Registration No

1060/2025

Registration Date

28-May-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BASAVANA BAGEWADI

Judge

201-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0121

Police Station

BASAVANA BAGEWADI PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 78(VI)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka Rby PSI Basavana Bagewadi PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP Balloli Basanti Siddharay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Mallikarjun Jadar

  2. 2.Rakesh Ashok Agarawal

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Judgment

    Case Summary: 1060/2025 Court: Principal District Judge & First Class Judicial Magistrate, Basavana Bagewadi Decided: 26 May 2026 Key Finding: The court acquitted the first accused (Prakash Mallikarjun Jadar) of charges under Karnataka Police Act Section 78(6) for illegal cricket betting, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case despite testimonies from police witnesses; contradictions between statements of prosecution witnesses and weak corroborative evidence undermined the charges. Outcome: First accused discharged; bail bonds cancelled; seized mobile phones and ₹4,100 cash to be handed to government after appeal period lapses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  4. 18-May-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  5. 04-May-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  6. 25-Apr-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Statement U/S 313 CrPC

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  11. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  12. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  13. 23-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  15. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  17. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  18. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  19. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  20. 16-Sep-2025

    NBW

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  21. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  22. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  23. 23-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  24. 18-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  25. 17-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  26. 12-Jun-2025

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Basavana Bagewadi

  27. 28-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 28-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1060/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1060/2025 Court: Principal District Judge & First Class Judicial Magistrate, Basavana Bagewadi Decided: 26 May 2026 Key Finding: The court acquitted the first accused (Prakash Mallikarjun Jadar) of charges under Karnataka Police Act Section 78(6) for illegal cricket betting, finding insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case despite testimonies from police witnesses; contradictions between statements of prosecution witnesses and weak corroborative evidence undermined the charges. Outcome: First accused discharged; bail bonds cancelled; seized mobile phones and ₹4,100 cash to be handed to government after appeal period lapses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case