Basavaraj So Bhommaningappa Chour vs The State of Karnataka, Rby PSI Sindagi — 103/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS

CNR: KAVP010070122025

Filing Number

104/2025

Filing Date

17-Sep-2025

Registration No

103/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA

Judge

193-III Addl District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Basavaraj So Bhommaningappa Chour

    Adv. Baragall Sukadevi Krishnappa.

  2. 2.Bhimu So Bhommaningappa Chour

  3. 3.Devu So Siddappa Harijan

  4. 4.Goutam So Ningappa Khanapur

  5. 5.Lakkappa Urf Laxman So Malakappa Kuchabal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka, Rby PSI Sindagi

  2. 2.The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Sindagi, Rby PP (Public Prosecutor) Vijayapura

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Crl.R.P.No. 103/2025 The court set aside the Taluka Executive Magistrate's preliminary order requiring five petitioners to execute a ₹5,00,000 bond for good behavior, finding the magistrate failed to independently apply his mind and merely relied on a police report without conducting any inquiry or establishing specific grounds for breach of peace. The judge emphasized that magistrates must independently verify facts, form reasoned opinions, and provide specific justifications before issuing such orders, which were wholly absent in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  4. 04-May-2026

    Orders

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  8. 19-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.R.P.No. 103/2025 The court set aside the Taluka Executive Magistrate's preliminary order requiring five petitioners to execute a ₹5,00,000 bond for good behavior, finding the magistrate failed to independently apply his mind and merely relied on a police report without conducting any inquiry or establishing specific grounds for breach of peace. The judge emphasized that magistrates must independently verify facts, form reasoned opinions, and provide specific justifications before issuing such orders, which were wholly absent in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case