The State of Karnataka, Rby PP Vijayapura vs Mohmad Ashraf Moulasab Mulla Advocate - Patil Vijaykumar Siddangowd. — 138/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2),351(3),115(2),54,61(2),109(1),103(1),3(5). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Session Case - SESSION CASES

CNR: KAVP010061872025

e-Filing Number

12-08-2025

Filing Number

138/2025

Filing Date

12-Aug-2025

Registration No

138/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA

Judge

190-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0088

Police Station

BABALESWARA PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2),351(3),115(2),54,61(2),109(1),103(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka, Rby PP (Public Prosecutor) Vijayapura

    Adv. P P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohmad Ashraf Moulasab Mulla Advocate - Patil Vijaykumar Siddangowd.

  2. 2.Moulasab Albisab Mulla

    Adv. Patil Vijaykumar Siddangowd.

  3. 3.Rukshana Moulasab Mulla

    Adv. Patil Vijaykumar Siddangowd.

Case History

  1. 30-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Deposition

    Summary of Case 138/2025 This is a criminal case before the Principal District and Sessions Court, Vijayapura, involving an investigation by the State of Karnataka against respondents Mohmad Ashraf Moulasab Mulla and others. The court conducted witness examination on June 29, 2026, where a police witness (Witness Ayoub, age 43) testified regarding evidence collection. The witness identified and authenticated various documents and physical evidence, including: a notice issued on April 26, 2025; a seized motorcycle; an investigation memo; six clothing items recovered from the deceased; and photographs. The defense counsel (Sri V.S.P.) raised objections regarding the authenticity and proper seizure of evidence before the court. The case appears to involve criminal investigation proceedings with evidence documentation and witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    F.D.T.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Charge

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Property And Fdt.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 29-Nov-2025

    Charge

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Charge

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 06-Nov-2025

    Hbc

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 23-Oct-2025

    Hbc

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 27-Sep-2025

    Hbc

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 15-Sep-2025

    Hbc

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 29-Aug-2025

    Engage Counsel.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 13-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 12-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 138/2025 This is a criminal case before the Principal District and Sessions Court, Vijayapura, involving an investigation by the State of Karnataka against respondents Mohmad Ashraf Moulasab Mulla and others. The court conducted witness examination on June 29, 2026, where a police witness (Witness Ayoub, age 43) testified regarding evidence collection. The witness identified and authenticated various documents and physical evidence, including: a notice issued on April 26, 2025; a seized motorcycle; an investigation memo; six clothing items recovered from the deceased; and photographs. The defense counsel (Sri V.S.P.) raised objections regarding the authenticity and proper seizure of evidence before the court. The case appears to involve criminal investigation proceedings with evidence documentation and witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case