Meheboob So Gudusab Pandu vs The State of Karnataka, Rby PSI Indi Rural PS, PP Vijayapura — 534/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVP010030082026

Filing Number

531/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

534/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA

Judge

193-III Addl District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

102

Police Station

INDI RURAL PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Meheboob So Gudusab Pandu

    Adv. Saudi Inamadar Mohd Rafiq Abdulrazaq.

  2. 2.Munni So Meheboob Pandu

  3. 3.Ayan So Meheboob Pandu

  4. 4.Rajesab So Gudusab Pandu

  5. 5.Peeru So Gudusab pandu

  6. 6.Gudusab Pandu

  7. 7.Lalsab Peeru Pandu

  8. 8.Buddesab So Gudusab Pandu

  9. 9.Shajan Wo Piru Pandu

  10. 10.Bibi Wo Rajesab Pandu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka, Rby PSI Indi Rural PS (Police Station), PP (Public Prosecutor) Vijayapura

  2. 2.Shabana Wo Mehboobsab Choudhri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No. 534/2026 Decision: The court ALLOWED the anticipatory bail petition filed by ten accused persons. The court granted bail on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with surety, finding that most investigation was complete, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the presumption of innocence must be maintained. Key Reasoning: The court noted mutual complaints between parties over a land/road dispute, with a counter-case filed simultaneously. While some charges were non-bailable, they don't carry death or life imprisonment penalties. The court held that pre-trial detention amounts to punishment before conviction and conditions (monthly police reporting, court attendance, no witness tampering) would address prosecution concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  4. 30-May-2026

    Orders

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 26-May-2026

    Objection

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 534/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No. 534/2026 Decision: The court ALLOWED the anticipatory bail petition filed by ten accused persons. The court granted bail on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with surety, finding that most investigation was complete, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and the presumption of innocence must be maintained. Key Reasoning: The court noted mutual complaints between parties over a land/road dispute, with a counter-case filed simultaneously. While some charges were non-bailable, they don't carry death or life imprisonment penalties. The court held that pre-trial detention amounts to punishment before conviction and conditions (monthly police reporting, court attendance, no witness tampering) would address prosecution concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case