Afroz So Abdulrehman Vati Urf Wati vs The State of Karnataka, Rby PSI Golgumbaz PS, PP Vijayapura — 532/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVP010030042026

Filing Number

529/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

532/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA

Judge

1161-IV Addl District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

GOLGUMBAZ PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Afroz So Abdulrehman Vati Urf Wati

    Adv. Khyadi Murughendra Shivabasappa.

  2. 2.Mohammad Khaif So Afroz Vati Urf Wati

  3. 3.Jishan So Shakil Ahmad Managuli

  4. 4.Mohammad Umer So Shakil Ahmad Managuli

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka, Rby PSI Golgumbaz PS (Police Station), PP (Public Prosecutor) Vijayapura

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Order

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.565/2026 Court Decision: The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayapura, granted anticipatory bail to accused Hakimasab on June 3, 2026, in a case involving alleged offences under BNS sections 329(3), 75, and 78 (trespassing and outraging modesty). Key Reasoning: Although the offences are non-bailable, they do not carry death sentence or life imprisonment. The accused has no criminal antecedents, is not required for custodial interrogation, and no evidence of witness tampering was presented. The court applied principles from Gurubhaksh Singh's case, holding that bail denial amounts to deprivation of liberty without sufficient justification. Conditions: The accused must execute a ₹50,000 personal bond with one surety, surrender within 30 days, appear for investigation, not tamper with witnesses, cooperate with authorities, and avoid similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Orders

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 26-May-2026

    Objection

    IV Addl District And Sessions Judge

  7. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 532/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.565/2026 Court Decision: The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayapura, granted anticipatory bail to accused Hakimasab on June 3, 2026, in a case involving alleged offences under BNS sections 329(3), 75, and 78 (trespassing and outraging modesty). Key Reasoning: Although the offences are non-bailable, they do not carry death sentence or life imprisonment. The accused has no criminal antecedents, is not required for custodial interrogation, and no evidence of witness tampering was presented. The court applied principles from Gurubhaksh Singh's case, holding that bail denial amounts to deprivation of liberty without sufficient justification. Conditions: The accused must execute a ₹50,000 personal bond with one surety, surrender within 30 days, appear for investigation, not tamper with witnesses, cooperate with authorities, and avoid similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case