Babu Hanamanta Navi vs The State of Karnataka, R.by PSI, Chadachan P.S. Through P.P. Vijayapura — 515/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVP010029502026

Filing Number

513/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

515/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA

Judge

193-III Addl District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

66

Police Station

CHADACHAN PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Babu Hanamanta Navi

    Adv. Khyadi Murughendra Shivabasappa.

  2. 2.Jayashree Babu Navi

  3. 3.Kashibai Sanju Navi Urf Rajshree Mane

  4. 4.Revansidda Hanamanta Navi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka, R.by PSI, Chadachan P.S. Through P.P. Vijayapura

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Crl.Misc.515/2026 Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners in a property dispute case involving alleged assault, abuse, and threats. Key Reasoning: The judge found that while serious allegations exist (including assaults with weapons and neck-squeezing), most investigation is complete, custodial interrogation isn't needed, the victim is out of danger, and the accused deserve presumption of innocence. The non-bailable offences involved aren't exclusively punishable by death or life imprisonment. Bail was granted with conditions: Rs.1,00,000 personal bond each with surety, monthly police reporting, court attendance, witness non-interference, and address updates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 19-May-2026

    Hearing

    III Addl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 15-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 515/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.515/2026 Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners in a property dispute case involving alleged assault, abuse, and threats. Key Reasoning: The judge found that while serious allegations exist (including assaults with weapons and neck-squeezing), most investigation is complete, custodial interrogation isn't needed, the victim is out of danger, and the accused deserve presumption of innocence. The non-bailable offences involved aren't exclusively punishable by death or life imprisonment. Bail was granted with conditions: Rs.1,00,000 personal bond each with surety, monthly police reporting, court attendance, witness non-interference, and address updates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case