Siddappa Sahebgouda Belundagi vs The State of Karnataka, Through Sindagi P.S. — 504/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVP010029362026
Filing Number
504/2026
Filing Date
12-May-2026
Registration No
504/2026
Registration Date
12-May-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA
Judge
191-I Addl District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
SINDAGI PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siddappa Sahebgouda Belundagi
Adv. Badri Ravi Suresh
-
2.Mallikarjuna Sahebgouda Belundagi
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Karnataka, Through Sindagi P.S.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-May-2026
Order
Case Summary: 504/2026 The court granted regular bail to both accused petitioners in a case involving alleged attempted murder and assault arising from a land dispute. The judge found that the injuries sustained were non-serious, investigation was substantially complete, the offences were not capital crimes, and the accused had cooperated with police, warranting bail on stringent conditions including personal bonds of ₹1,00,000 each and bi-weekly police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
Disposed
I Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
Orders
I Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2026
Hearing
I Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
13-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 504/2026
Case Summary: 504/2026 The court granted regular bail to both accused petitioners in a case involving alleged attempted murder and assault arising from a land dispute. The judge found that the injuries sustained were non-serious, investigation was substantially complete, the offences were not capital crimes, and the accused had cooperated with police, warranting bail on stringent conditions including personal bonds of ₹1,00,000 each and bi-weekly police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts