The State of Karnataka, Rby PP Vijayapura vs Bheemappa So Shasappa Hirekurabar — 67/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,118(2),352,3(5). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Aug-2026 this date has passed

Session Case - SESSION CASES

CNR: KAVP010029202025

e-Filing Number

21-04-2025

Filing Number

67/2025

Filing Date

21-Apr-2025

Registration No

67/2025

Registration Date

21-Apr-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA

Judge

191-I Addl District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0124

Police Station

BABALESWARA PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,118(2),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka, Rby PP (Public Prosecutor) Vijayapura

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bheemappa So Shasappa Hirekurabar

  2. 2.Kashinath So Suresh Turayi

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. 04-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  3. 25-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    F.D.T.

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Deposition

    This document records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of Dr. Pratik Kumbar, a medical officer, in a criminal trial. Dr. Kumbar testified about treating a victim (Ramu Chandrappa Molagi) who sustained stab and strangulation injuries on 25-07-2024, and later examined a knife produced by police, opining it could have caused the documented injuries. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the reliability of his medical conclusions, highlighting inconsistencies such as missing documentation, lack of blood stains on the weapon, and alternative injury mechanisms. The case remains ongoing with witness testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  12. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  13. 27-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  14. 27-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  15. 27-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  16. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  17. 09-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  18. 09-Feb-2026

    Deposition

  19. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  20. 14-Jan-2026

    Deposition

  21. 14-Jan-2026

    Deposition

  22. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  23. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  24. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  25. 29-Oct-2025

    F.D.T.

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  26. 29-Sep-2025

    Charge

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  27. 08-Sep-2025

    Hbc

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  28. 12-Aug-2025

    Hbc

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  29. 18-Jul-2025

    Hbc

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  30. 21-Jun-2025

    Summons

    I Addl District And Sessions Judge

  31. 22-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 21-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of Dr. Pratik Kumbar, a medical officer, in a criminal trial. Dr. Kumbar testified about treating a victim (Ramu Chandrappa Molagi) who sustained stab and strangulation injuries on 25-07-2024, and later examined a knife produced by police, opining it could have caused the documented injuries. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the reliability of his medical conclusions, highlighting inconsistencies such as missing documentation, lack of blood stains on the weapon, and alternative injury mechanisms. The case remains ongoing with witness testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case