Abhishek Manjunath Biradar vs The State of Karnataka, R.by P.P. and PSI, B.Bagewadi P.S. — 502/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVP010029122026
Filing Number
497/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
502/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA
Judge
193-III Addl District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
100
Police Station
BASAVANA BAGEWADI PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Abhishek Manjunath Biradar
Adv. Biradar Mahesh M.
-
2.Shivanand Mahadevappa Pujari Urf Mulimani
-
3.Shantabai Mahadevappa Pujari Urf Mulimani
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Karnataka, R.by P.P. and PSI, B.Bagewadi P.S.
-
2.Manjunath Shankar Jalageri
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Order
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No. 502/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of assault, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation arising from a property dispute. The judge found that most investigation was complete, custodial interrogation wasn't required, the injured party had recovered, and a countercase existed, warranting bail subject to conditions including monthly police reporting and witness non-interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Disposed
III Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
01-Jun-2026
Orders
III Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
19-May-2026
Hearing
III Addl District And Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 502/2026
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No. 502/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of assault, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation arising from a property dispute. The judge found that most investigation was complete, custodial interrogation wasn't required, the injured party had recovered, and a countercase existed, warranting bail subject to conditions including monthly police reporting and witness non-interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts