Mehabub Maktumsab Bagawan vs The State of Karnataka, Through the P.P., Sessions Court, Vijayapura Advocate - P P — 479/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAVP010028622026
Filing Number
474/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
479/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA
Judge
190-Prl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
ADARSHANAGAR PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mehabub Maktumsab Bagawan
Adv. Pande Raghunandan Keshavprasad
-
2.Sainaz Mehabub Huded
-
3.Maktumsab Bagawan
-
4.Noorjanabi Maktumsab Bagawan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Karnataka, Through the P.P., Sessions Court, Vijayapura Advocate - P P
-
2.Ramizaegum Mehabub Bagawan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-May-2026
Order
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. No. 479/2026 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners (Mehabub Bagawan, Sainaz Huded, Maktumsab Bagawan, and Noorjanabi Bagawan) in Crime No. 54/2026. The court found that while allegations of assault arose from admitted family and monetary disputes over maintenance payments, the charges did not warrant custodial detention given their non-capital nature, absence of criminal antecedents, and context rooted in familial discord rather than serious violence. Key Conditions: Each petitioner must execute a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with a surety, remain available for investigation, refrain from witness tampering, and cooperate fully with authorities during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
Disposed
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
Orders
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
22-May-2026
Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2026
Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2026
Objection
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 479/2026
Case Summary: Criminal Misc. No. 479/2026 Court Decision: The Principal District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners (Mehabub Bagawan, Sainaz Huded, Maktumsab Bagawan, and Noorjanabi Bagawan) in Crime No. 54/2026. The court found that while allegations of assault arose from admitted family and monetary disputes over maintenance payments, the charges did not warrant custodial detention given their non-capital nature, absence of criminal antecedents, and context rooted in familial discord rather than serious violence. Key Conditions: Each petitioner must execute a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with a surety, remain available for investigation, refrain from witness tampering, and cooperate fully with authorities during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts