Shrishail Dundappa Dodamani Urf Chalawadi vs The State of Karnataka, R.by P.P. Vijayapura, Through PSI, Kolhar PS — 474/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVP010028572026

Filing Number

469/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

474/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA

Judge

192-II Addl District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

KOLHAR PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shrishail Dundappa Dodamani Urf Chalawadi

    Adv. Pattenshetti Shivraj Basappa.

  2. 2.Sujata Shrishail Dodamani Urf Chalawadi

  3. 3.Yallappa Shrishail Dodamani Urf Chalawadi

  4. 4.Sabu Shrishail Dodamani Urf Chalawadi

  5. 5.Bhagyashree Yallappa Dodamani Urf Chalawadi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka, R.by P.P. Vijayapura, Through PSI, Kolhar PS (Police Station)

  2. 2.Jayashree Ramanagoud Biradar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No. 474/2026 Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to all five petitioners in a property dispute case involving allegations of unlawful assembly, assault, and life threats. The petitioners must execute personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with one surety and comply with conditions including monthly reporting to police, court attendance, and non-interference with witnesses. Key Reasoning: The judge found that most charges are bailable, investigation is largely complete, the injured party has been discharged from hospital, petitioners have no criminal history, and there's unexplained three-day delay in lodging the complaint. The court noted this appears to be a counter-case to a complaint filed by petitioner No.1 against the complainant's family, and held that pre-trial detention without guilt being proven violates the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 18-May-2026

    Hearing

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 14-May-2026

    Hearing

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  7. 08-May-2026

    Objection

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  8. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 474/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No. 474/2026 Decision: The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to all five petitioners in a property dispute case involving allegations of unlawful assembly, assault, and life threats. The petitioners must execute personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with one surety and comply with conditions including monthly reporting to police, court attendance, and non-interference with witnesses. Key Reasoning: The judge found that most charges are bailable, investigation is largely complete, the injured party has been discharged from hospital, petitioners have no criminal history, and there's unexplained three-day delay in lodging the complaint. The court noted this appears to be a counter-case to a complaint filed by petitioner No.1 against the complainant's family, and held that pre-trial detention without guilt being proven violates the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case