Shivanand So Bapuouda Minajagi, Rby POA Holder Sudeep So Mudakappa Dengi vs The State of Karnataka, Rby PP Vijayapura — 289/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVP010017782026

Filing Number

284/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

289/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VIJAYAPURA

Judge

192-II Addl District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

148

Police Station

BASAVANA BAGEWADI PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivanand So Bapuouda Minajagi, Rby POA Holder Sudeep So Mudakappa Dengi

    Adv. Chimmalagi Irappa Shankreppa.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka, Rby PP (Public Prosecutor) Vijayapura

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-May-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.289/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's application for interim custody of a TVS motorcycle (Reg. No. KA-28/HF-9143) seized during a criminal investigation. The judge held that it serves no purpose keeping seized vehicles unused at police stations, and that interim custody requests from owners should be considered liberally, citing the Supreme Court's precedent that magistrates should pass appropriate orders with adequate bonds and guarantees. The motorcycle was released subject to stringent conditions including a Rs.50,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on tampering or alienating the vehicle until appeal period expiry, production of original documents, and production before investigating officer or court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-May-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  5. 18-May-2026

    Hearing

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  6. 11-May-2026

    Production Of Documents

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  7. 04-May-2026

    Production Of Documents

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  8. 24-Apr-2026

    Production Of Documents

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  9. 17-Apr-2026

    Production Of Documents

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  10. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  11. 07-Apr-2026

    Objection

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  12. 28-Mar-2026

    Appearance Of Complainant

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  13. 25-Mar-2026

    Appearance Of Complainant

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge

  14. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.289/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's application for interim custody of a TVS motorcycle (Reg. No. KA-28/HF-9143) seized during a criminal investigation. The judge held that it serves no purpose keeping seized vehicles unused at police stations, and that interim custody requests from owners should be considered liberally, citing the Supreme Court's precedent that magistrates should pass appropriate orders with adequate bonds and guarantees. The motorcycle was released subject to stringent conditions including a Rs.50,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on tampering or alienating the vehicle until appeal period expiry, production of original documents, and production before investigating officer or court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case