M Rahamathulla S/o. Mukkalli Mahamad Sab vs The Tahasildara, Harapanahalli — 1140/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KAVN510046382025

e-Filing Number

09-12-2025

Filing Number

1140/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

1140/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI

Judge

254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETELLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Rahamathulla S/o. Mukkalli Mahamad Sab

    Adv. BHP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahasildara, Harapanahalli

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court accepted the joint memorandum filed by both parties, wherein the respondent consented to allow the petition as prayed for. The order was passed by both the Non-Judicial and Judicial Conciliators, resulting in the petition being granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1140/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the joint memorandum filed by both parties, wherein the respondent consented to allow the petition as prayed for. The order was passed by both the Non-Judicial and Judicial Conciliators, resulting in the petition being granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case