Mujubur Rahaman S/o. Mohammad Haneefsab vs The Tahasildara, Harapanahalli — 1015/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/s.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KAVN510038762025
e-Filing Number
29-11-2025
Filing Number
1016/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
1015/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mujubur Rahaman S/o. Mohammad Haneefsab
Adv. BHP
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahasildara, Harapanahalli
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge of Harapanahalli allowed Mujubur Rahaman's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register his birth (10.06.1978, Uchangidurga village) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged evidence (Aadhar card, age certificate) sufficient and the respondent's absence as default, relying on Karnataka High Court precedent that the factum of birth—not the exact date—is the material consideration in such proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
07-Feb-2026
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
03-Jan-2026
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1015/2025
Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge of Harapanahalli allowed Mujubur Rahaman's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register his birth (10.06.1978, Uchangidurga village) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged evidence (Aadhar card, age certificate) sufficient and the respondent's absence as default, relying on Karnataka High Court precedent that the factum of birth—not the exact date—is the material consideration in such proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts