Kaleem K S/o. Yusoof Sab vs The Chief Officer — 1010/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/s.13(3). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KAVN510038712025
e-Filing Number
28-11-2025
Filing Number
1011/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
1010/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kaleem K S/o. Yusoof Sab
Adv. Muntesheem
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Chief Officer
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Apr-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In Criminal Miscellaneous case 1010/2025, the witness (P.W.1) was called on 07.03.2026 and gave sworn testimony. The court admitted four documentary exhibits (Aadhar card copy, Ration card copy, Passport copy, and an affidavit) after comparing them with original documents and verifying their authenticity. The court found the opponent had no advocate present and recorded that no further cross-examination was required, concluding the examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
07-Feb-2026
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
03-Jan-2026
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1010/2025
Summary: In Criminal Miscellaneous case 1010/2025, the witness (P.W.1) was called on 07.03.2026 and gave sworn testimony. The court admitted four documentary exhibits (Aadhar card copy, Ration card copy, Passport copy, and an affidavit) after comparing them with original documents and verifying their authenticity. The court found the opponent had no advocate present and recorded that no further cross-examination was required, concluding the examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts