Smt. Drakshayanamma W/o. Late. Halappa vs Sanna Lakkappa S/o. Late. Mallappa — 298/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O.7,Rule 1. Status: Evidence-C. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAVN510037212025
e-Filing Number
10-11-2025
Filing Number
298/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
298/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Drakshayanamma W/o. Late. Halappa
Adv. REVANAGOUDA BRG
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanna Lakkappa S/o. Late. Mallappa
-
2.Mahesh S/o. Late. Mallappa
-
3.Dodda Dandyeppa S/io. Late. Choudappa
-
4.Sanna Dandyeppa S/o. Late. Choudappa
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
21-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
10-Feb-2026
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
30-Jan-2026
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
15-Dec-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS-298/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED The Civil Judge at Harapanahalli allowed the plaintiff's application under Order 39 Rule 1&2 CPC, restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property until the suit's disposal. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case based on RORs (Records of Rights) showing the property in her late husband's name and subsequently in hers, rejected defendants' unsupported claims about ancestral joint family property, and determined balance of convenience favored the plaintiff to prevent irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Dec-2025
Issues-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
12-Dec-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
06-Dec-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
04-Dec-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
26-Nov-2025
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
19-Nov-2025
For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
12-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 298/2025
Case Summary: OS-298/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED The Civil Judge at Harapanahalli allowed the plaintiff's application under Order 39 Rule 1&2 CPC, restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property until the suit's disposal. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case based on RORs (Records of Rights) showing the property in her late husband's name and subsequently in hers, rejected defendants' unsupported claims about ancestral joint family property, and determined balance of convenience favored the plaintiff to prevent irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts