A Prabu S/o. Arasanalu Shivappa vs The Chief Officer — 890/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/s.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KAVN510035712025

Case disposedSub Stage

e-Filing Number

13-10-2025

Filing Number

892/2025

Filing Date

14-10-2025

Registration No

890/2025

Registration Date

14-10-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI

Judge

254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

Police Station

HARAPANAHALLI PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section U/s.13(3)

Petitioner(s)

A Prabu S/o. Arasanalu Shivappa

Adv. REVANAGOUDA BRG

Respondent(s)

The Chief Officer

Hearing History

Judge: 254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

07-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

22-01-2026

EVIDENCE-C

24-12-2025

EVIDENCE-C

13-12-2025

APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Orders

Court Decision Summary Decision: The Civil Judge and JMFC, Harapanahalli allowed the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the respondent municipality to register the birth of the petitioner's son (Arasanalu Anjinappa S/o. A.Prabhu) with date of birth 28.07.2012 and birthplace as Government Hospital, Harapanahalli, and issue a birth certificate upon collection of requisite fees. Key Reasoning: Since the respondent remained absent and failed to contest the petition, the petitioner's unchallenged testimony and documentary evidence (school certificate, Aadhar card) proving the birth were accepted. The court applied established Karnataka High Court precedent that under Section 13(3), the magistrate's primary concern is confirming the factum of birth itself, not the precise date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary Decision: The Civil Judge and JMFC, Harapanahalli allowed the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the respondent municipality to register the birth of the petitioner's son (Arasanalu Anjinappa S/o. A.Prabhu) with date of birth 28.07.2012 and birthplace as Government Hospital, Harapanahalli, and issue a birth certificate upon collection of requisite fees. Key Reasoning: Since the respondent remained absent and failed to contest the petition, the petitioner's unchallenged testimony and documentary evidence (school certificate, Aadhar card) proving the birth were accepted. The court applied established Karnataka High Court precedent that under Section 13(3), the magistrate's primary concern is confirming the factum of birth itself, not the precise date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case