A Prabu S/o. Arasanalu Shivappa vs The Chief Officer — 890/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/s.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KAVN510035712025
e-Filing Number
13-10-2025
Filing Number
892/2025
Filing Date
14-10-2025
Registration No
890/2025
Registration Date
14-10-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
HARAPANAHALLI PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A Prabu S/o. Arasanalu Shivappa
Adv. REVANAGOUDA BRG
Respondent(s)
The Chief Officer
Hearing History
Judge: 254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 24-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 13-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF PARTIES/ADVOCATES-C |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Decision: The Civil Judge and JMFC, Harapanahalli allowed the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the respondent municipality to register the birth of the petitioner's son (Arasanalu Anjinappa S/o. A.Prabhu) with date of birth 28.07.2012 and birthplace as Government Hospital, Harapanahalli, and issue a birth certificate upon collection of requisite fees. Key Reasoning: Since the respondent remained absent and failed to contest the petition, the petitioner's unchallenged testimony and documentary evidence (school certificate, Aadhar card) proving the birth were accepted. The court applied established Karnataka High Court precedent that under Section 13(3), the magistrate's primary concern is confirming the factum of birth itself, not the precise date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary Decision: The Civil Judge and JMFC, Harapanahalli allowed the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the respondent municipality to register the birth of the petitioner's son (Arasanalu Anjinappa S/o. A.Prabhu) with date of birth 28.07.2012 and birthplace as Government Hospital, Harapanahalli, and issue a birth certificate upon collection of requisite fees. Key Reasoning: Since the respondent remained absent and failed to contest the petition, the petitioner's unchallenged testimony and documentary evidence (school certificate, Aadhar card) proving the birth were accepted. The court applied established Karnataka High Court precedent that under Section 13(3), the magistrate's primary concern is confirming the factum of birth itself, not the precise date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts