Akki Matada Pooja D/o A V Karibasajjayya vs Chief Secretary, — 219/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 26, O-7, R-1 Of CPC. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 29th April 2026.
O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAVN510025662025
e-Filing Number
13-08-2025
Filing Number
219/2025
Filing Date
18-Aug-2025
Registration No
219/2025
Registration Date
18-Aug-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Akki Matada Pooja D/o A V Karibasajjayya
Adv. G Veeranna
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chief Secretary,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
24-Apr-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
06-Apr-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
28-Mar-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
03-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
27-Feb-2026
Deposition
Case Summary: OS 219/2025 The court examined the petitioner's witness (PW-1) testimony on 27-02-2026, where the petitioner claimed all statements in the affidavit were true and authenticated. However, the opposing counsel (A.G.P.) argued that the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence proving the father's name as A.V. Karibasajjayya, the respondent provided no counter-documentation, and the petitioner submitted fabricated documents to the court while giving false testimony. The court found no valid legal grounds and dismissed the case as time-barred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence On Defence(cr)
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
16-Oct-2025
Issues-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
15-Oct-2025
Issues-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
14-Oct-2025
Issues-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
13-Oct-2025
Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
17-Sep-2025
Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
21-Aug-2025
Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
20-Aug-2025
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
19-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 219/2025
Case Summary: OS 219/2025 The court examined the petitioner's witness (PW-1) testimony on 27-02-2026, where the petitioner claimed all statements in the affidavit were true and authenticated. However, the opposing counsel (A.G.P.) argued that the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence proving the father's name as A.V. Karibasajjayya, the respondent provided no counter-documentation, and the petitioner submitted fabricated documents to the court while giving false testimony. The court found no valid legal grounds and dismissed the case as time-barred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts