Maheshwarappa N vs Tahsildar — 572/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KAVN510021542025
e-Filing Number
08-07-2025
Filing Number
572/2025
Filing Date
09-07-2025
Registration No
572/2025
Registration Date
09-07-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maheshwarappa N
Adv. RAMACHANDRANAIk S
Respondent(s)
Tahsildar
Hearing History
Judge: 254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 21-02-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 17-01-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of "Kalamma W/o Late Siddappa Kadthi" as occurring on 28.01.1991 at Uchangidurga village and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged evidence credible, noting that the respondent did not contest and no objections were filed despite public notice, and that under relevant case law, the factum of death (not the exact date) is the material consideration in such proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of "Kalamma W/o Late Siddappa Kadthi" as occurring on 28.01.1991 at Uchangidurga village and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged evidence credible, noting that the respondent did not contest and no objections were filed despite public notice, and that under relevant case law, the factum of death (not the exact date) is the material consideration in such proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts