B N Kumar S/o. B Keshyanaik vs Smt. Kammibai W/o. Jayanaik — 168/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 02nd June 2026.
O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAVN510016322025
Filing Number
168/2025
Filing Date
01-Jul-2025
Registration No
168/2025
Registration Date
01-Jul-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B N Kumar S/o. B Keshyanaik
Adv. K. Basavaraja,
-
2.B Suneel S/o. B Keshyanaik
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt. Kammibai W/o. Jayanaik
-
2.Shettyanaik S/o. Late. Ramanaik
-
3.Jayanaik S/o. Late. Muniyanaik
-
4.B Sakrayanaik S/o. Late. Kokyanaik
-
5.N Lalyanaik S/o. Pakkeranaik
-
6.Gomlibai W/o. Late. Nagyanaik
-
7.Samkibai D/o. Late. Ramanaik
-
8.B Dayananda S/o. Late. B Manohar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 168/2025 The Civil Judge at Harapanahalli decreed the plaintiffs' suit and declared they possess prescriptive easement rights over a cart way (EFGH) through defendants' land to access their property. The court issued a perpetual injunction restraining defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' use of this access route, finding the plaintiffs' unchallenged evidence and official survey maps conclusively established both the easement right and defendants' obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
02-May-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
27-Apr-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
15-Apr-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
28-Mar-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
26-Mar-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
04-Feb-2026
Judgment/Final Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
20-Jan-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
18-Dec-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
04-Dec-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
07-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
15-Jul-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
11-Jul-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
09-Jul-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
02-Jul-2025
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
01-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 168/2025
Case Summary: O.S. No. 168/2025 The Civil Judge at Harapanahalli decreed the plaintiffs' suit and declared they possess prescriptive easement rights over a cart way (EFGH) through defendants' land to access their property. The court issued a perpetual injunction restraining defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' use of this access route, finding the plaintiffs' unchallenged evidence and official survey maps conclusively established both the easement right and defendants' obstruction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts