Karnataka Gramin Bank its Manager and P.A holder Punith Kumar Tiwari vs Smt. Shanthi Bai w/o Valya Naik — 143/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O.7,R.1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAVN510013782025
Filing Number
143/2025
Filing Date
05-Jun-2025
Registration No
143/2025
Registration Date
10-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karnataka Gramin Bank its Manager and P.A holder Punith Kumar Tiwari
Adv. B.KRISHNAMURTHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt. Shanthi Bai w/o Valya Naik
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
20-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In O.S. 143/2025, the witness (P.W.1) was examined on 20-02-2026 and gave sworn testimony. The court admitted eight documentary exhibits including the loan application, promissory note, hypothecation agreement, loan sanction letters, legal notice, postal acknowledgment, and loan account statement. The defendant's cross-examination was not taken as the defendant was absent, and the case was scheduled for final arguments on the suit for decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District
-
10-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 143/2025
Summary: In O.S. 143/2025, the witness (P.W.1) was examined on 20-02-2026 and gave sworn testimony. The court admitted eight documentary exhibits including the loan application, promissory note, hypothecation agreement, loan sanction letters, legal notice, postal acknowledgment, and loan account statement. The defendant's cross-examination was not taken as the defendant was absent, and the case was scheduled for final arguments on the suit for decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts