Smt. Kenchamma, vs Chikkanagoudra Sanna Hanumanthapa, — 212/2014
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section U/o7Rule1and2C.P.C.. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAVN510013202014
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
206/2014
Filing Date
03-09-2014
Registration No
212/2014
Registration Date
05-09-2014
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Kenchamma,
Adv. Chandramouli Advocate, Harapanahalli.
Respondent(s)
Chikkanagoudra Sanna Hanumanthapa,
Shanthamma
Chandramma
Hearing History
Judge: 254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
Case Summary OS No. 212/2014 - Witness Examination Order Witness PW-1 was examined on 07-03-2026 and administered oath. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding property-related disputes involving the 5th respondent, including issues concerning a deceased person's account in the 1st respondent's name and disputed property transfers from 2006-07. The court noted discrepancies in the witness's knowledge of when certain matters were questioned and found the 5th respondent was intentionally impleaded in the suit. The examination was concluded and the witness cross-examination was adjourned, with time granted to the respondent's counsel for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary OS No. 212/2014 - Witness Examination Order Witness PW-1 was examined on 07-03-2026 and administered oath. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding property-related disputes involving the 5th respondent, including issues concerning a deceased person's account in the 1st respondent's name and disputed property transfers from 2006-07. The court noted discrepancies in the witness's knowledge of when certain matters were questioned and found the 5th respondent was intentionally impleaded in the suit. The examination was concluded and the witness cross-examination was adjourned, with time granted to the respondent's counsel for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts