Ningamma vs Executive Officer Advocate - Thippeswamy, S.G. — 114/2018
Case under U/s 7 Rule 1 and 3 of Cpc Section UNDERSECTION,7,1AND2. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAVN510005742018
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
112/2018
Filing Date
27-06-2018
Registration No
114/2018
Registration Date
28-06-2018
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ningamma
Adv. Thippeswamy, S.G.
Kotrappa
Respondent(s)
Executive Officer Advocate - Thippeswamy, S.G.
Panchayath Development Officer
The Secretary
Hearing History
Judge: 254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 31-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 18-07-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 14-03-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. 114/2018, dated 23-12-2021, the court ordered that the case be heard under Schedule 2 procedure. The court found that the plaintiff's evidence was deficient and noted that the defendant did not appear before the court. The petition was dismissed due to insufficient evidence and default of the defendant's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. 114/2018, dated 23-12-2021, the court ordered that the case be heard under Schedule 2 procedure. The court found that the plaintiff's evidence was deficient and noted that the defendant did not appear before the court. The petition was dismissed due to insufficient evidence and default of the defendant's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts