Arisinagundi Siddesh vs Smt. Nagamma — 104/2017
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KAVN510004582017
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
101/2017
Filing Date
06-06-2017
Registration No
104/2017
Registration Date
12-06-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arisinagundi Siddesh
Adv. B.KRISHNAMURTHY
Smt. Prema
Smt. Savithri
Smt. Rekha
Smt. Veena
Respondent(s)
Smt. Nagamma
Smt. Gouramma
Sri. Ajjappa
Sri Basavaraja
Sri. Hanumajji Chandrappa
Hosamani Thimmappa
Tha Tahashildar
Hearing History
Judge: 254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 14-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 18-09-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
Case Summary OS No. 104/2017 - Property Dispute The first witness (PW-1) was examined and administered oath on 07-03-2026 in this Original Suit concerning a land dispute. The witness testified regarding the boundaries and ownership of the disputed property (measuring 1 acre 46 cents), describing the neighboring properties on all four sides. The witness also deposed that the defendant purchased the property for Rs. 66,000/- on 19.06.2012 and has been cultivating it since then. The court adjourned the proceedings to allow the defendant's counsel time to cross-examine the witness, with the witness statement recorded in the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary OS No. 104/2017 - Property Dispute The first witness (PW-1) was examined and administered oath on 07-03-2026 in this Original Suit concerning a land dispute. The witness testified regarding the boundaries and ownership of the disputed property (measuring 1 acre 46 cents), describing the neighboring properties on all four sides. The witness also deposed that the defendant purchased the property for Rs. 66,000/- on 19.06.2012 and has been cultivating it since then. The court adjourned the proceedings to allow the defendant's counsel time to cross-examine the witness, with the witness statement recorded in the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts