Shanthamma vs M. Halamma — 61/2017

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Evidence-C. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence-C Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KAVN510002862017

Filing Number

62/2017

Filing Date

30-Mar-2017

Registration No

61/2017

Registration Date

30-Mar-2017

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI

Judge

254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shanthamma

    Adv. P. Jagadish Gouda,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. Halamma

  2. 2.M. Jayappa

  3. 3.M. Jagadeesh

  4. 4.M. Hanumanthappa

  5. 5.Jyothemma

  6. 6.Halamma

  7. 7.R. Basappa

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  4. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  5. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  6. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  7. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  8. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  9. 09-Aug-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  10. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  11. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  12. 25-Oct-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  13. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  14. 19-Sep-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  15. 01-Sep-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  16. 11-Aug-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  17. 26-May-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  18. 17-Mar-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  19. 24-Nov-2022

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  20. 22-Apr-2022

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  21. 17-Dec-2021

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  22. 16-Sep-2021

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  23. 23-Jul-2021

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  24. 15-Apr-2021

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  25. 03-Mar-2021

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  26. 12-Feb-2021

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  27. 22-Jan-2021

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  28. 01-Dec-2020

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  29. 13-Nov-2020

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  30. 07-Oct-2020

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  31. 23-Sep-2020

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  32. 09-Sep-2020

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  33. 27-Aug-2020

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  34. 05-May-2020

    Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  35. 16-Apr-2020

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  36. 27-Mar-2020

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  37. 03-Mar-2020

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  38. 17-Feb-2020

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  39. 14-Feb-2020

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  40. 03-Jan-2020

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  41. 26-Nov-2019

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  42. 14-Nov-2019

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  43. 25-Sep-2019

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  44. 12-Sep-2019

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  45. 16-Aug-2019

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  46. 19-Jul-2019

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  47. 07-Jun-2019

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  48. 19-Mar-2019

    Restored

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  49. 19-Mar-2019

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  50. 08-Aug-2018

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The partition suit filed by Smt. Shanthamma against six family members and one outsider was dismissed by the Civil Judge, Harapanahalli on August 8, 2018. The court found the plaintiff failed to prove that the suit properties were Hindu undivided joint family and ancestral properties, as she produced no genealogical tree, did not include all joint family members as parties, and could not substantiate her claims with supporting documents. No costs were awarded considering the family relationship between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  51. 08-Aug-2018

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  52. 30-Jul-2018

    Judgments CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  53. 09-Jul-2018

    Judgments CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  54. 28-Jun-2018

    Arguments CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  55. 21-Apr-2018

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  56. 26-Mar-2018

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  57. 25-Mar-2018

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  58. 15-Dec-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  59. 09-Nov-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  60. 06-Oct-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  61. 11-Aug-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  62. 17-Jun-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  63. 13-Apr-2017

    Evidence CIVIL

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  64. 01-Apr-2017

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  65. 31-Mar-2017

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  66. 30-Mar-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 30-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The partition suit filed by Smt. Shanthamma against six family members and one outsider was dismissed by the Civil Judge, Harapanahalli on August 8, 2018. The court found the plaintiff failed to prove that the suit properties were Hindu undivided joint family and ancestral properties, as she produced no genealogical tree, did not include all joint family members as parties, and could not substantiate her claims with supporting documents. No costs were awarded considering the family relationship between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case