B. Rajashekar Gouda vs Pushpa Patil Alias Mukdadamma — 32/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7Rule,1,R/w26. Status: Issues-C. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.

Issues-C Next hearing 14-Mar-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KAVN510001552022

Filing Number

32/2022

Filing Date

09-Feb-2022

Registration No

32/2022

Registration Date

09-Feb-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI

Judge

254-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7Rule,1,R/w26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B. Rajashekar Gouda

    Adv. B.KRISHNAMURTHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pushpa Patil Alias Mukdadamma

  2. 2.Linganagouda

  3. 3.Gangamma Patel

  4. 4.Basavanagouda

  5. 5.Sakramara Nagaraja

  6. 6.Kavitha

  7. 7.Sunitha

  8. 8.Savitramma

  9. 9.Channamma

  10. 10.Shankramma

  11. 11.Rushabendragouda

  12. 12.Ratnamma

  13. 13.Mamatha

Case History

  1. 14-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Issues-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  3. 11-Dec-2025

    Issues-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  4. 23-Oct-2025

    Issues-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  5. 10-Sep-2025

    Issues-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  6. 07-Aug-2025

    Issues-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  7. 06-Mar-2025

    Issues-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  8. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  9. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  10. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  11. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  12. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  13. 02-Aug-2023

    Orders

    Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for ex-parte temporary injunction (I.A. No.1) seeking to restrain defendants from interfering with peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property (Sy.No.310C/1). The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as revenue records showed the property was jointly registered in both the plaintiff's and defendants' names, and the court could not conduct a "mini-trial" to determine actual possession at the interlocutory stage. The case will proceed to full trial where the ownership dispute will be decided on evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 02-Aug-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  15. 31-Jul-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  16. 28-Jul-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  17. 25-Jul-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  18. 16-Jun-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  19. 22-May-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  20. 29-Mar-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  21. 24-Mar-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  22. 15-Feb-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  23. 19-Jan-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  24. 18-Nov-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  25. 13-Oct-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  26. 28-Sep-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  27. 06-Sep-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  28. 03-Aug-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  29. 18-Jul-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  30. 08-Jun-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  31. 25-May-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  32. 19-Apr-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  33. 25-Mar-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  34. 10-Feb-2022

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  35. 09-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 09-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for ex-parte temporary injunction (I.A. No.1) seeking to restrain defendants from interfering with peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural property (Sy.No.310C/1). The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as revenue records showed the property was jointly registered in both the plaintiff's and defendants' names, and the court could not conduct a "mini-trial" to determine actual possession at the interlocutory stage. The case will proceed to full trial where the ownership dispute will be decided on evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case