Halavagalu PS vs Kannavara Mahantesh S/o Manjappa — 1244/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 283,504,323,332,353,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVN500017912023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1244/2023

Filing Date

16-09-2023

Registration No

1244/2023

Registration Date

16-09-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI

Judge

841-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Decision Date

04th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

HALAWAGAL PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 283,504,323,332,353,

Petitioner(s)

Halavagalu PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Kannavara Mahantesh S/o Manjappa

Chigateri Basavaraja S/o Chigateri Sangappa

Pujar Kariyappa alias Pujjar Shekharaja S/o Shivappa

Hearing History

Judge: 841-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

04-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

07-03-2026

JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER

04-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

03-03-2026

313 STATEMENT/STATEMENT OF ACCUSED(CR)

Final Orders / Judgements

04-04-2026
Judgment

The court acquitted all three accused persons of charges under IPC sections 283, 504, 323, 332, and 353, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the complainant (bus driver) testified half-heartedly, key eyewitnesses turned hostile, and critical details about the alleged assault and abusive language were not adequately established, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

23-01-2025
Deposition
13-02-2025
Deposition
27-03-2025
Deposition
18-12-2025
Deposition
07-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted all three accused persons of charges under IPC sections 283, 504, 323, 332, and 353, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the complainant (bus driver) testified half-heartedly, key eyewitnesses turned hostile, and critical details about the alleged assault and abusive language were not adequately established, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case