Halavagalu PS vs Kannavara Mahantesh S/o Manjappa — 1244/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 283,504,323,332,353. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAVN500017912023

Filing Number

1244/2023

Filing Date

16-Sep-2023

Registration No

1244/2023

Registration Date

16-Sep-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI

Judge

841-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

HALAWAGAL PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 283,504,323,332,353

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Halavagalu PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kannavara Mahantesh S/o Manjappa

  2. 2.Chigateri Basavaraja S/o Chigateri Sangappa

  3. 3.Pujar Kariyappa alias Pujjar Shekharaja S/o Shivappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court acquitted all three accused persons of charges under IPC sections 283, 504, 323, 332, and 353, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the complainant (bus driver) testified half-heartedly, key eyewitnesses turned hostile, and critical details about the alleged assault and abusive language were not adequately established, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgment/Final Order

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    313 Statement/Statement Of Accused(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    313 Statement/Statement Of Accused(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  12. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  15. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  16. 18-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  20. 18-Sep-2025

    Appearance Of Accused(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  21. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  22. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  23. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  24. 27-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  26. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  27. 13-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  28. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  29. 23-Jan-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  31. 18-Dec-2024

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  32. 06-Nov-2024

    Evidence On Prosecution(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  33. 07-Oct-2024

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  34. 22-Aug-2024

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  35. 11-Jul-2024

    Hearing Before Charge(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  36. 04-Jul-2024

    For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  37. 03-Jul-2024

    For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  38. 04-Apr-2024

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  39. 10-Jan-2024

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  40. 08-Nov-2023

    Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Harapanahalli Vijayanagara District

  41. 16-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 16-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1244/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted all three accused persons of charges under IPC sections 283, 504, 323, 332, and 353, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the complainant (bus driver) testified half-heartedly, key eyewitnesses turned hostile, and critical details about the alleged assault and abusive language were not adequately established, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case