Halavagilu PSI vs Kambli Venkatesh S/o Dodda Bharamappa — 412/2024
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 32(3), 15(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAVN500006492024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
412/2024
Filing Date
07-03-2024
Registration No
412/2024
Registration Date
07-03-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
841-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
70
Police Station
HALAWAGAL PS
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Halavagilu PSI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Kambli Venkatesh S/o Dodda Bharamappa
Hearing History
Judge: 841-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 07-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER | |
| 05-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 31-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Harapanahalli acquitted Sri Kambali Venkatesh of charges under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act 1965 for illegal liquor possession and sale. The court found that while official witnesses supported the prosecution's case, the independent pancha witnesses (required to verify seizures) turned hostile and denied participating in the raid, creating reasonable doubt about whether the liquor was actually recovered from the accused's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Harapanahalli acquitted Sri Kambali Venkatesh of charges under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act 1965 for illegal liquor possession and sale. The court found that while official witnesses supported the prosecution's case, the independent pancha witnesses (required to verify seizures) turned hostile and denied participating in the raid, creating reasonable doubt about whether the liquor was actually recovered from the accused's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts