Chigateri PSI vs Anni Kubherappa S/o Late Lokappa — 264/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506,34. Status: EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR). Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAVN500005432023
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
264/2023
Filing Date
26-04-2023
Registration No
264/2023
Registration Date
26-04-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
841-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chigateri PSI
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Anni Kubherappa S/o Late Lokappa
Anni Devaraja S/o Late Lokappa
Hearing History
Judge: 841-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR)
EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR)
EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR)
EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR)
EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR) |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR) |
| 30-12-2025 | EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR) |
| 12-11-2025 | EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR) |
| 30-09-2025 | EVIDENCE ON PROSECUTION(CR) |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. CC 264/2023 | Senior Civil and JMFC Court, Harapanahalli The witness (Pooja, age 30) testified about an alleged violent altercation on 22.11.2022 involving the accused and multiple parties. The court recorded the witness statement and examined evidence including seized iron rods and blood-stained clothes (marked as MO 1-3). However, the accused's defense counsel extensively cross-examined the witness, challenging the credibility of her account and the prosecution's evidence collection procedures. The judge acknowledged the cross-examination arguments regarding inconsistencies in the complaint and procedural irregularities in the police investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. CC 264/2023 | Senior Civil and JMFC Court, Harapanahalli The witness (Pooja, age 30) testified about an alleged violent altercation on 22.11.2022 involving the accused and multiple parties. The court recorded the witness statement and examined evidence including seized iron rods and blood-stained clothes (marked as MO 1-3). However, the accused's defense counsel extensively cross-examined the witness, challenging the credibility of her account and the prosecution's evidence collection procedures. The judge acknowledged the cross-examination arguments regarding inconsistencies in the complaint and procedural irregularities in the police investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts