ICICI Bank Ltd., vs Umesha S S/o Shivanayka — 10/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 rule 1,2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN500001052023
Filing Number
10/2023
Filing Date
09-01-2023
Registration No
10/2023
Registration Date
09-01-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI
Judge
841-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ICICI Bank Ltd.,
Adv. G.S.Sannaveerappa
Respondent(s)
Umesha S S/o Shivanayka
Shiva naik S/o Hobyanaik
Somalavva W/o Hobyanaik
Lakshmi Bai W/o Shivanaik
Hearing History
Judge: 841-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER |
| 10-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 17-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decreed ICICI Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 6,56,132 against the defendants who defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card loan of Rs. 5,90,000 sanctioned in 2017. The court found the bank's claims established through bank documents and uncontroverted evidence, particularly since defendants failed to file a written statement or challenge the witness testimony, and ordered defendants to pay the amount with 18% annual interest from the suit filing date, with recourse to sell the mortgaged agricultural properties in Eshapura village to recover the dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court decreed ICICI Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 6,56,132 against the defendants who defaulted on a Kisan Credit Card loan of Rs. 5,90,000 sanctioned in 2017. The court found the bank's claims established through bank documents and uncontroverted evidence, particularly since defendants failed to file a written statement or challenge the witness testimony, and ordered defendants to pay the amount with 18% annual interest from the suit filing date, with recourse to sell the mortgaged agricultural properties in Eshapura village to recover the dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts