Smt. Hoovakka.K d/o. Halappa W/o. Thirukappa, vs Smt. Rathnamma .K D/o. Halappa W/o. Virupakshappa, — 237/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.VII,Rules,1,2,R/W,sec,26,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400041822025
Filing Number
241/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
237/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Hoovakka.K d/o. Halappa W/o. Thirukappa,
Adv. HOSAMANI SUJATHA
-
2.Smt Parvathamma Kayakada D/o. Halappa w/o. Late Chandrappa
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt. Rathnamma .K D/o. Halappa W/o. Virupakshappa,
-
2.Smt. Renukavva Hadapada D/o. Late Halappa W/o. Shivanandappa Hadapada
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
The Lok-Adalath Bench at Hadagali accepted a compromise petition between the parties in a partition and separate possession suit (OS.No.237/2025). The court decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise terms after verifying that both parties voluntarily consented to the settlement and that it complied with public policy and law. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
07-Mar-2026
Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
29-Jan-2026
Summons/Warrant To The Accused/Notice(cr)
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
06-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 237/2025
The Lok-Adalath Bench at Hadagali accepted a compromise petition between the parties in a partition and separate possession suit (OS.No.237/2025). The court decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise terms after verifying that both parties voluntarily consented to the settlement and that it complied with public policy and law. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts