Smt. Hoovakka.K d/o. Halappa W/o. Thirukappa, vs Smt. Rathnamma .K D/o. Halappa W/o. Virupakshappa, — 237/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.VII,Rules,1,2,R/W,sec,26,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400041822025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
241/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
237/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Hoovakka.K d/o. Halappa W/o. Thirukappa,
Adv. HOSAMANI SUJATHA
Smt Parvathamma Kayakada D/o. Halappa w/o. Late Chandrappa
Respondent(s)
Smt. Rathnamma .K D/o. Halappa W/o. Virupakshappa,
Smt. Renukavva Hadapada D/o. Late Halappa W/o. Shivanandappa Hadapada
Hearing History
Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Disposed
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 29-01-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 06-12-2025 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok-Adalath Bench at Hadagali accepted a compromise petition between the parties in a partition and separate possession suit (OS.No.237/2025). The court decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise terms after verifying that both parties voluntarily consented to the settlement and that it complied with public policy and law. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok-Adalath Bench at Hadagali accepted a compromise petition between the parties in a partition and separate possession suit (OS.No.237/2025). The court decreed the suit in accordance with the compromise terms after verifying that both parties voluntarily consented to the settlement and that it complied with public policy and law. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts