J.Manjappa S/o. Late Jyothi Parameshwarappa vs Smt. Umadevi W/o. J.Ramesha — 357/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.VII,Rule,1,2,CPC. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400040252024
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
359/2024
Filing Date
20-12-2024
Registration No
357/2024
Registration Date
20-12-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J.Manjappa S/o. Late Jyothi Parameshwarappa
Adv. U.Kotresha, Advocate
Respondent(s)
Smt. Umadevi W/o. J.Ramesha
Jyothi Virupakshappa S/o. Late Jyothi Basappa
Smt. Neelamma W/o. Jyothi Virupakshappa
Smt. Jyothi Shanthamma W/o. late Basappa
Hearing History
Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 08-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 31-10-2025 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 19-09-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
The court order (O.S. No. 357/2024) dated 19-09-2025 appears to be a land dispute case involving RTC (Revenue Tax Certificate) documents and a related FIR (Crime No. 96/2024). The court admitted various certified copies of RTC records covering different survey numbers and acreage measurements from 2002-2024, along with mutation register documents. The order indicates evidence was marked and the case proceeded on substantive grounds regarding land ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order (O.S. No. 357/2024) dated 19-09-2025 appears to be a land dispute case involving RTC (Revenue Tax Certificate) documents and a related FIR (Crime No. 96/2024). The court admitted various certified copies of RTC records covering different survey numbers and acreage measurements from 2002-2024, along with mutation register documents. The order indicates evidence was marked and the case proceeded on substantive grounds regarding land ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts