Smt Sujatha KA vs Kottur Angadi Jayappa — 127/2017
Case under Under Order Section US. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400016672017
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
127/2017
Filing Date
02-11-2017
Registration No
127/2017
Registration Date
02-11-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Sujatha KA
Adv. Pathribasappa S B
Respondent(s)
Kottur Angadi Jayappa
Smt Kuttur Angadi Gouramma
Praveen K A
Kiran K A
Hearing History
Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 24-10-2025 | EVIDENCE-C | |
| 30-08-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
Summary In this Original Suit No. 127/2017, the court examined a property dispute involving multiple agricultural land parcels (Schedule A property nos. 529/a, 475 b/1, 164 a/1, and 163 a/2) and their partition among family members. The plaintiff contended that certain properties were improperly partitioned in 2004 when she was a minor (14 years old), and sought relief regarding her rightful share. The court found merit in the plaintiff's claims regarding the improper partition during her minority and the subsequent wrongful exclusion of her from property ownership. The court allowed the petition in favor of the plaintiff, directing appropriate partition and recognition of her legal rights to the disputed properties as per established succession principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this Original Suit No. 127/2017, the court examined a property dispute involving multiple agricultural land parcels (Schedule A property nos. 529/a, 475 b/1, 164 a/1, and 163 a/2) and their partition among family members. The plaintiff contended that certain properties were improperly partitioned in 2004 when she was a minor (14 years old), and sought relief regarding her rightful share. The court found merit in the plaintiff's claims regarding the improper partition during her minority and the subsequent wrongful exclusion of her from property ownership. The court allowed the petition in favor of the plaintiff, directing appropriate partition and recognition of her legal rights to the disputed properties as per established succession principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts