A.M.Veeraiah S/o late Ajjayya vs H.M.Renukaiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah — 120/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII,rule 1 and 2,R/w 26. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN400014752023

EVIDENCE-C

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

121/2023

Filing Date

01-07-2023

Registration No

120/2023

Registration Date

01-07-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI

Judge

172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII,rule 1 and 2,R/w 26

Petitioner(s)

A.M.Veeraiah S/o late Ajjayya

Adv. S.H.Chabbi

Respondent(s)

H.M.Renukaiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah

H.M.Vrushabendraiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah

Hearing History

Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE-C

22-01-2026

EVIDENCE-C

15-11-2025

EVIDENCE-C

30-08-2025

EVIDENCE-C

19-07-2025

EVIDENCE-C

Interim Orders

08-09-2023
Issue
08-09-2023
Orders

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in this land dispute case. The defendants are hereby restrained from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff's possession and cultivation of the suit properties (agricultural land) until the main suit is disposed of. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case based on an agreement of sale from 1994, continuous possession, revenue department reports confirming cultivation, and photographic evidence, while the defendants failed to produce any documents supporting their ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in this land dispute case. The defendants are hereby restrained from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff's possession and cultivation of the suit properties (agricultural land) until the main suit is disposed of. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case based on an agreement of sale from 1994, continuous possession, revenue department reports confirming cultivation, and photographic evidence, while the defendants failed to produce any documents supporting their ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case