A.M.Veeraiah S/o late Ajjayya vs H.M.Renukaiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah — 120/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII,rule 1 and 2,R/w 26. Status: EVIDENCE-C. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400014752023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
121/2023
Filing Date
01-07-2023
Registration No
120/2023
Registration Date
01-07-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.M.Veeraiah S/o late Ajjayya
Adv. S.H.Chabbi
Respondent(s)
H.M.Renukaiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah
H.M.Vrushabendraiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah
Hearing History
Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
EVIDENCE-C
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 15-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 30-08-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
| 19-07-2025 | EVIDENCE-C |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in this land dispute case. The defendants are hereby restrained from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff's possession and cultivation of the suit properties (agricultural land) until the main suit is disposed of. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case based on an agreement of sale from 1994, continuous possession, revenue department reports confirming cultivation, and photographic evidence, while the defendants failed to produce any documents supporting their ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in this land dispute case. The defendants are hereby restrained from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff's possession and cultivation of the suit properties (agricultural land) until the main suit is disposed of. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case based on an agreement of sale from 1994, continuous possession, revenue department reports confirming cultivation, and photographic evidence, while the defendants failed to produce any documents supporting their ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts