A.M.Veeraiah S/o late Ajjayya vs H.M.Renukaiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah — 120/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII,rule 1 and 2,R/w 26. Status: Evidence-C. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence-C Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAVN400014752023

Filing Number

121/2023

Filing Date

01-Jul-2023

Registration No

120/2023

Registration Date

01-Jul-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI

Judge

172-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII,rule 1 and 2,R/w 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.M.Veeraiah S/o late Ajjayya

    Adv. S.H.Chabbi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H.M.Renukaiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah

  2. 2.H.M.Vrushabendraiah S/o late H.M.Mallaiah

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  4. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  5. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  6. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  7. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  8. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  9. 30-Nov-2024

    Awaiting records

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  10. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  11. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  12. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  13. 25-Jan-2024

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  14. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  15. 08-Sep-2023

    IssueView PDF

  16. 08-Sep-2023

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in this land dispute case. The defendants are hereby restrained from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff's possession and cultivation of the suit properties (agricultural land) until the main suit is disposed of. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case based on an agreement of sale from 1994, continuous possession, revenue department reports confirming cultivation, and photographic evidence, while the defendants failed to produce any documents supporting their ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 08-Sep-2023

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  18. 02-Sep-2023

    For orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  19. 03-Aug-2023

    For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  20. 26-Jul-2023

    For Objection/Counter To Main Petition(cr)

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  21. 03-Jul-2023

    First Hearing/Maintainability-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  22. 01-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 01-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in this land dispute case. The defendants are hereby restrained from interfering with or obstructing the plaintiff's possession and cultivation of the suit properties (agricultural land) until the main suit is disposed of. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case based on an agreement of sale from 1994, continuous possession, revenue department reports confirming cultivation, and photographic evidence, while the defendants failed to produce any documents supporting their ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case