Smt Basamma wife of late Basappa M D vs V B Mallikeshi S-o late Basavarajappa — 88/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7R,1,2CPC. Status: Evidence-C. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400012742021
Filing Number
88/2021
Filing Date
30-Jul-2021
Registration No
88/2021
Registration Date
30-Jul-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt Basamma wife of late Basappa M D
Adv. M B Kori
-
2.Smt Mallamma wife of Manteshappa Morageri
-
3.Smt Manjula wife of Karibasappa Igalla
Respondent(s)
-
1.V B Mallikeshi S-o late Basavarajappa
-
2.V B Mallappa son of late Basavarajappa
-
3.V B Manjunatha s-o late Basavarajappa
-
4.V B Yogesha s-o late Basavarajappa
-
5.V B Shivananda s-o late Basavarajappa
-
6.V B Pradeepa s-o late Basavarajappa
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
31-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
In Original Suit No. 88/2021, the court order dated 31-01-2025 dismissed the plaintiff's application. The court found that the contentions raised by the plaintiff (represented by advocate M.B.K.) lacked merit and were not substantiated. The case has been disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
29-Nov-2024
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
31-May-2024
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
16-Nov-2023
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
26-Aug-2023
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
25-Aug-2023
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
23-Jun-2023
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
17-Feb-2023
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
03-Dec-2022
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
17-Sep-2022
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
06-Aug-2022
Evidence-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
26-May-2022
Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
05-Mar-2022
Written Statements/Objection To Main Petition-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
10-Feb-2022
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
28-Oct-2021
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
21-Aug-2021
Appearance Of Parties/Advocates-C
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.
-
30-Jul-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 88/2021
In Original Suit No. 88/2021, the court order dated 31-01-2025 dismissed the plaintiff's application. The court found that the contentions raised by the plaintiff (represented by advocate M.B.K.) lacked merit and were not substantiated. The case has been disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts