Reshma D/o Ramanaik 19yrs R/o Beetyana Thanda, Hadagali vs The Tahasildar, Huvinahadagali — 363/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAVN400012652025

Filing Number

363/2025

Filing Date

05-Apr-2025

Registration No

363/2025

Registration Date

05-Apr-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI

Judge

172-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Reshma D/o Ramanaik 19yrs R/o Beetyana Thanda, Hadagali

    Adv. S Basavaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahasildar, Huvinahadagali

  2. 2.The Village Accountant, Beetyana Thanda

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Reshma (19 years) against the Tahasildar and Village Accountant due to the petitioner's continuous absence from proceedings. The court found that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing the case and therefore dismissed the petition for default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  4. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  5. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence-C

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hoovina Hadagalivijayanagara District.

  7. 18-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 363/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition filed by Reshma (19 years) against the Tahasildar and Village Accountant due to the petitioner's continuous absence from proceedings. The court found that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing the case and therefore dismissed the petition for default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case