J Shanthamma H Shanthamma W o late Revanasidappa age 65 yrs Agriculturist R o Kenchammanahalli v vs J V Basavaraja S o late Veerabdrappa age 72 yrs R o Harapanahalli Town — 171/2015
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section UnderorderVIIRule1secton26and151ofCPC. Status: SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR). Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400011842015
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
171/2015
Filing Date
18-12-2015
Registration No
171/2015
Registration Date
18-12-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J Shanthamma H Shanthamma W o late Revanasidappa age 65 yrs Agriculturist R o Kenchammanahalli v
Adv. Manjunath THM Advocate
Respondent(s)
J V Basavaraja S o late Veerabdrappa age 72 yrs R o Harapanahalli Town
J V Chandarskara S o late Veerabadrappa age 61 yrs R o Bangalore
Smt J Sumagal W o Mahabaleshwara gouda Lalithamaba House Binnilayout Vijayanagara Bangalore
Premalatha W o R o Prabakar age 57 yrs R o V.N. College Hospet Ballari District
Smt Nagrathna W o Siddanagouda age 54 yrs R o Vidya Nagara Davanagere District
Smt Nirmala W o Veerash Gouda agriculturist R o Campus Quarters Rampur Rachur city
B Shivappa S o Sidappa age 40 yrs R o Ittigi village Hadagali
Hearing History
Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 06-02-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 12-12-2025 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 06-11-2025 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 25-09-2025 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) |
Interim Orders
Summary: The suit of the plaintiffs has been dismissed on default due to non-prosecution by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Huvinahadagali. The dismissal was ordered because the plaintiffs failed to actively pursue their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The suit of the plaintiffs has been dismissed on default due to non-prosecution by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Huvinahadagali. The dismissal was ordered because the plaintiffs failed to actively pursue their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts