Oli Dodda Mudukappa S o late Siddappa age 62 yrs R o Koilaragatii village vs Oli Dodda Siddappa S o Sanna Ravappa age 63 yrs Agriculturist R o Koilaragatti village — 166/2015
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section UnderorderVIIrules1and2readwithsection26CPC. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN400011662015
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
166/2015
Filing Date
11-12-2015
Registration No
166/2015
Registration Date
11-12-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOOVINA HADAGALLI
Judge
172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Oli Dodda Mudukappa S o late Siddappa age 62 yrs R o Koilaragatii village
Adv. S SURESH MUDIMALLAPPA
Oli Irupakshappa S o late Siddappa age 56 yrs R o Koilaragatti village
Oli Maheshappa S o late Siddappa age 50 yrs R o Koilaragatti village
Respondent(s)
Oli Dodda Siddappa S o Sanna Ravappa age 63 yrs Agriculturist R o Koilaragatti village
Hearing History
Judge: 172-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINA HADAGALIVIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 28-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: O.S.No.166/2015 DW.2 | Date: 24-07-2025 | Language: Kannada Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish their claims regarding property rights and succession matters. The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments that defendants had wrongfully withheld property or violated inheritance rights, noting inconsistencies in the evidence presented and lack of credible proof supporting the plaintiff's version of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: O.S.No.166/2015 DW.2 | Date: 24-07-2025 | Language: Kannada Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish their claims regarding property rights and succession matters. The court rejected the plaintiff's arguments that defendants had wrongfully withheld property or violated inheritance rights, noting inconsistencies in the evidence presented and lack of credible proof supporting the plaintiff's version of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts